"I praksis betyder dette at den amerikanske efterretningstjeneste[NSA] vil blive givet tilladelse til fortsat at lytte til enhver virksomhed og hver person i Tyskland."(Dette omfatter Kansleren selv, hvis telefonsamtaler tidligere blev pinligt afsløret til at have været lyttet til af NSA. Nu vil det blive lovligt.)
Dette kunne være en del af Vestens opbygning mod en global krig. Ifølge en rapport udstedt den 6. juni i German Economic News, så forbereder den tyske regering sig på at gå i krig mod Rusland, og har i udkastform en rapport fra Bundeswehr (hæren) som erklærer Rusland for at være et fjendeland. DWN sagde der:
"Den russiske efterretningstjeneste har tilsyneladende grundigt studeret rapporten. Forud for rapportens publicering er en barsk protest sendt til Berlin: Formanden for Udenrigskomiteen i den russiske stats Duma, Alexei Puschkow, har postet denne Twitter meddelelse:'Den tyske regerings beslutning til at erklære Rusland for værende en fjende viser Merkels underdanighed til Obama administrationen.'"
Kommentar: Denne artikel af delvis oversat til dansk af sott.net fra: Is the German Foreign Intelligence Service (BND) becoming a branch office of America's CIA?
Back on February 17th, DWN had reported that German Chancellor Merkel "will develop a new military doctrine" declaring, "The 'annexation' of Crimea by Russia is the basis for military action against Moscow." Apparently, that prior report will soon be fulfilled.
Taken all together, these news reports from DWN indicate a clear subordination of the German government to the U.S. government, in a period of preparation for a NATO war against Russia.
However, not mentioned at all in the DWN articles — nor anywhere else in Western 'news' media — is a crucial fact, a fact that the head of America's 'private CIA' firm Stratfor acknowledged only when addressing a Russian-speaking audience, because it reveals the fraudulence of the West's alleged 'justification' for all of this economic and now also military action by the West against Russia: that (in English) the overthrow of Ukraine's President in Russia's neighboring nation of Ukraine during February 2014 was "the most blatant coup in history." That coup, in turn, led to the separation from Ukraine of the two regions of Ukraine that had voted overwhelmingly for the President whom Obama had just overthrown.
Extensive video documentation exists demonstrating that the overthrow was a coup, and even demonstrating that the Obama Administration had selected Ukraine's post-coup leader 22 days prior to his being formally appointed by the Ukrainian parliament. Furthermore, the only detailed scholarly study of the evidence that has been performed came to the same conclusion — that it was a U.S. coup. The last month before the coup was incredibly violent, with Obama's hired fascists attacking the government's securitly forces brutally: Here is some of the bloodshed from the prior month, on January 21st, then January 22nd, then January 25th.
Moreover, immediately after the overthrow, when the EU sent its own investigator into Kiev to report back on how the overthrow had taken place, he too reported that it had been a coup. Subsequently revealed was that the Obama Administration had started preparing the coup inside the U.S. Embassy in Kiev by no later than 1 March 2013 — almost a year prior to the coup. Also, the even earlier preparation for the coup, extending through decades, on the part of CIA-affiliated 'nonprofit' or NGO organizations (funded by Western aristocrats and their corporations), laying the groundwork for this coup, has been brilliantly documented at some online sites.
None of this information has been widely published — it's virtually not at all published in the West.Though the potential audience for it might be vast (especially since Western publics pay much of the tab for this operation and yet receive none of the benefits from the resultant looting of Ukraine, which goes all to aristocrats in the U.S. and allied aristocracies), the market in the West for reporting it, is virtually nil, because the market is the West's news media, and they've all (except for a few small ones like this) been taken over by the aristocracy, and serve the aristocracy — not the public (their audiences, whom they're in business to deceive). The aristocracy's companies advertise in, and thereby fund, most of those 'news' media, and the aristocracy's governments fund the rest — and the public pays for that, too, not just by being manipulated to vote for the aristocracy's politicians, but by being taxed to pay what the NGOs and their aristocrats don't (so the public are buying the weapons etc.). It's a vast money-funnel from the many, to the few.
Though the transfer of Crimea from Ukraine to Russia is treated by Western 'news' media as having been a 'conquest' by Russia, and as being Russia's 'seizure' of Crimea, and Russia's 'stealing' Crimea, nothing of the sort is true (and Crimeans had good reason to be terrified of the Obama-coup regime that had just been installed, from which Russia saved Crimeans), but the lie needs to be promulgated in order for the aristocracy's invasion of Russia to be able to organized and carried out.
Unfortunately, the reason why this U.S coup in Ukraine has still not been reported in the West, is that to make it public to Westerners would jeopardize not only the Western economic sanctions against Russia after Russia accepted the overwhelming decision by Crimeans to separate from the post-coup Ukrainian government, but would also jeopardize the preparations by all of NATO to go to war against Russia: both the sanctions and the invasion would have no basis and no support among Western publics. All of that (the sanctions, and now the pouring of troops and weapons onto and near Russia's borders for a possible invasion of Russia) would no longer be at all palatable by Western publics, if this history — that it all began by a violent U.S. coup in Ukraine — were to become known before the U.S. and NATO invasion occurs. So it all remains, instead, suppressed in the'democratic' West.
So: please email this article's URL address (which is immediately above this article), to friends, so as to spread to them the word, that NATO is preparing an invasion of Russia. There's no way that the 'news' media they see are likely to tell them (until it's already too late).
Author Note: The above news report was offered on the morning of June 7th as an exclusive, to the following newsmedia, all of whom ignored it; and so it's now being distributed free-of-charge to all newsmedia, but the following were the newsmedia that had already declined it as an exclusive news report: The Daily Beast, Slate, The Intercept, Huffington Post, Salon, Common Dreams, Truthout, ProPublica, Harper's, Atlantic, Foreign Policy, National Journal, AP, Globe and Mail, National Post, Telegraph, Guardian, Financial Times, The Economist, Daily Mail, London Times, London Review of Books, New Statesman, The Spectator, Bloomberg, NYT, McClatchy, CBS, CNN, Politico, The Nation, The National Interest, The New Republic, Reason, Rolling Stone, Buzzfeed, Newsweek, Time,USN&WR, Consortium News Service.
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They're Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,and of CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
Kan det tænkes, de blot legaliserer det, som har foregået i det skjulte lige siden anden verdenskrig?
"I perioden 1945-1949, hvor Horst Issel boede i Tyskland er der utvetydige beviser på, at han arbejdede som agent for CIA. Da CIA i begyndelsen af årtusindet deklassificerede store mængder materiale fra årene under og lige efter 2. Verdenskrig, dukkede der hemmeligstemplede rapporter op omkring Issel. I et CIA-dokument fra 16. juni 1945 beskrives Issels virke i Danmark under krigen kort, samt at han klassificeres som en extremely dangerous person. CIA havde altså kendskab til hans fortid og hans forbrydelser. Alligevel rekrutterer de ham som agent, og i et andet dokument beskrives han som likeable og good-natured . Hvad Issel helt præcist foretog sig for CIA kan vi kun gisne om, men qua hans fortid med bekæmpelse af industrispionage og hans tæft for at arrangere våbenleverancer, havde han en bred ekspertise - og et stort netværk til at foretage forskellige opgaver. Da Issel i 1949 bliver anholdt finder man under ransagningen i hans hjem et stort antal efterretningsdokumenter og rapporter fra CIA. Da CIA’s arkiver over agenter var mangelfulde, nægtede CIA i første omgang at Issel havde været tilknyttet som agent og modsatte sig derved ikke udleveringen af ham til Danmark. Da fejlen var blevet rettet, var det imidlertid for sent, selvom CIA gjorde flere indvendinger. Det skabte usikkerhed blandt de andre tyske agenter i CIA, da de var blevet lovet beskyttelse af organisationen. En ukendt tysk agent skulle i den forbindelse have udtalt ”If the SOB Americans won’t protect us, we won’t work for them.” Kilde [Link]