craig murray family flu
© craigmurray.org.uk
Jeg har altid været meget glad for dette foto af grunde, der måske er indlysende. Vi er fra venstre til højre Celia, Stuart, Neil, Craig, og i hele vores barndom var vi virkelig så tæt og så glade. Årsagen til, at jeg anfører dette nu, er, at min mor altid fortalte mig, at hun var forbløffet over, hvor godt vi så ud på billedet, fordi det blev taget, da vi alle var syge og væk fra skolen og syge med Hong Kong influenza.

Influenza-pandemien i Hong Kong i 1968/9 var den sidste virkelig alvorlige influenzapandemi, der fejede hen over Storbritannien. De ser usædvanligt regelmæssigt ud - 1919, 1969 og 2020. Influenzaepidemier har meget bedre punktlighed end togene (skønt jeg snød lidt der og udeladte den "asiatiske influenza" i 1958). I dag er "Hong Kong influenza" kendt som H3N2. Estimaterne for de dødsfald, den forårsagede over hele verden, varierer fra 1 til 4 millioner. I Storbritannien dræbte det anslået 80.000 mennesker.
uk deaths flu

Antal døde i Storbritannien som følge af virusudbrud
Hvis den nuværende coronavirus havde vist isg i 1968, ville den ganske enkelt have været kaldet "influenza", sandsynligvis "Wuhan influenza". COVID-19 klassificeres muligvis ikke i dag som sådan, men i min ungdom er influenza bestemt hvad vi ville have kaldt det. Hong Kong influenza var meget lig det aktuelle udbrud ved at være ekstremt smitsom, men med en relativt lav dødelighed. 30% af den britiske befolkning anslås at have været inficeret i Hong Kong influenzapandemi. Dødsfrekvensen var ca. 0,5%, for det meste ældre eller med underliggende sundhedsmæssige forhold.


Kommentar: Delvist oversat af Sott.net fra Momento Mori - Upopulære tanker om Coronavirus 351


But there was no massive panic, no second by second media hysteria, over Hong Kong flu. Let me start being unpopular. "Man in his 80's already not very well from previous conditions, dies of flu" is not and should not be a news headline. The coverage is prurient, intrusive, unbalanced and designed to cause hysteria.

Consider this: 100% of those who contract coronavirus are going to die. 100% of those who do not contract coronavirus are also going to die. The difference in average life expectancy between the two groups will prove to be only very marginal. That is because the large majority of those who die of COVID-19 will already be nearing the end of life or have other health problems.

Let me make this important statement. I write as somebody whose heart and lungs are damaged and in poor condition, following the multiple bilateral pulmonary emboli which nearly killed me in 2004, which mysteriously appeared at precisely the time the UK and US governments were desperately trying to get rid of me as Ambassador, just a couple of weeks after I had been finally cleared of all the false charges with which the British government had attempted to fit me up. I was in a coma for days and subsequently given a maximum of three years to live (read Murder in Samarkand for the full story). If I get COVID-19 I expect I shall be fairly quickly gone off on my next adventure.

But I am OK with that. I have lived an incredibly full and satisfying life. I have no desire whatsoever to die - I have a wife and children I love deeply and I have important political battles I wish to fight. But human beings are not supposed to live forever and one day my time will come.

What worries me about the current reaction to coronavirus, is that it seems to reflect a belief that death is an aberration, rather than a part of the natural order of things. As the human species continues to expand massively in numbers, and as it continues casually to make other species extinct, it is inevitable that the excessive and crowded human population will become susceptible to disease.

As we see the catastrophic effects of human beings on the environment, including on other species and the climate, I am genuinely perplexed as to what are the underlying assumptions and goals of humankind. Do we really believe that medical science could and should eliminate all disease? There are numerous, well-funded medical scientists working very hard on research into the idea that ageing itself is a process that can be prevented. Because that is a notion very attractive to wealthy westerners, more money is being spent on preventing ageing than on fighting malaria and other tropical diseases. Where does this end? Do we really want a world - or at least a wealthy word - where everybody gets to be a centenarian? What are the effects of that on overall population, on demographics, economics and the allocation of finite resources including food and housing?

The mass hysteria around the current coronavirus is being driven by a societal rejection of the notion that the human species is part of the wider ecology, and that death and disease are unavoidable facts, with which it ought to be part of the human condition to come to terms. Let me offer a comforting thought to those of you who have bought into the hysteria. I have no doubt whatsoever that mortality rates from the coronavirus are being exaggerated. They are all based on extrapolation from those who have been tested, but there exists a very large population of people, worldwide, who have or have had the coronavirus, whose symptoms have been those of a cold or non-existent, who have not put themselves forward for testing. The Hong Kong flu had a mortality rate of 0.5% and I believe that ultimately COVID-19 will prove to be very similar. Just like flu once you get it, the only difference being it is more contagious so more people will get it.

Yes wash your hands, bin your tissues, keep things clean. Don't hang around someone who has the flu. Take advantage of everything modern medicine can do to help you. But don't be too shocked at the idea that some sick people die, especially if they are old. We are not Gods, we are mortal. We need to reconnect to that idea.

All human deaths are individual tragedies. I wish all solace and comfort to the grieving, and in no way wish to minimise the pain of individual loss of anybody of any age (I lost my own mother not long ago), or that even a small number of child deaths in particular will be dreadfully painful. My deepest and heartfelt condolences go to all the bereaved, and my warm regards go to all the sick and the worried. But the perspective of the wider place of human life in the cosmos is a help in grieving. The purpose of this blog remains not to shirk from saying what might be unpopular. I do hope people will start to consider COVID-19 in a more measured way.
Unlike our adversaries including the Integrity Initiative, the 77th Brigade, Bellingcat, the Atlantic Council and hundreds of other warmongering propaganda operations, this blog has no source of state, corporate or institutional finance whatsoever. It runs entirely on voluntary subscriptions from its readers - many of whom do not necessarily agree with the every article, but welcome the alternative voice, insider information and debate.

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.