USA's præsident Ronald Reagan og den Sovjetiske leder, Mikhail Gorbachev underskriver Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Traktaten den 8. december 1987.
Midt i de voksende militære og diplomatiske spændinger mellem USA og Rusland, skriver den tyske avis Süddeutsche Zeitung fredag, at den amerikanske kongres har taget de første skridt i retning af Washingtongs annullering af traktaten om mellemdistance atomvåben, INF-traktaten.

INF eller Washingtontraktaten om mellemdistancekernevåbe er en blilateral aftale mellem USA og Sovjetunionen om afviklingen af kort og mellemdistancemissiler (med en rækkevidde mellem 800 og 8800 km) og forbud mod deres produktion.

Traktaten underskrevet den 8. december 1987 af den amerikanske præsident Ronald Reagan og den Sovjetiske leder Mikhail Gorbachev, ledte til en væsentlig reduktion i mængden af USA's kernevåben i Europa. De kernebevæbnede mellemdistancemissiler, Pershing II, som var blevet stationeret i Vesteuropa fem år tidligere og havde udløst de indtil da hidtil største fredsdemonstrationer, blev trukket tilbage.

Faren er nu, at "USA vil konstruere nye missiler og stationere dem i Europa," advarede Süddeutsche Zeitung. Et større skifte ville blive "sat igang" og Europa ville stå på kanten af en ny æra med kernevåben ... mellemdistance kernevåben var den kolde krigs skræk ... 30 år senere er faren vendt tilbage."


Kommentar: Delvist oversat af Sott.net fra NATO to discuss dropping INF Treaty and planning for nuclear war in Europe
Traktat eller ikke, med moderne teknologi og oprustningen i Europa, er stationeringen af mellemdistance kernevåben sandsynligvis reduceret til rekonfigurering af eksisterende systemer.


The reason for the potential ending of the treaty, according to the newspaper, is the "deep freeze" in US-Russia relations and announcements by both sides of intentions to "comprehensively modernize their nuclear arsenals."

Characteristically, the explosive reports by the German press have been totally ignored by the US print and broadcast media.

The report came amid a hysterical campaign being mounted by the US and NATO over military exercises planned by the Russian military in western Russia, Belarus and Russia's exclave of Kaliningrad later this month, with Washington and its allies suggesting that they could be used as a "Trojan horse" to pre-position weapons stockpiles and prepare an invasion of the Baltic states.

The Pentagon has deployed seven US F-15C fighter planes to a base in Lithuania along with an additional 600 US airborne troops to the Baltics in advance of the war games.

This military build-up has been carried out in conjunction with a major US diplomatic provocation as the Trump administration has retaliated against Russia's expulsion of US embassy personnel from Russia (itself a tit-for-tat response to earlier expulsions of Russians from the US) by ordering the shutdown of three Russian diplomatic facilities in Washington, New York and San Francisco. Moscow has charged that the action, which it said was accompanied by FBI searches of the San Francisco consulate and the residences of Russian diplomatic personnel, constituted a violation of international law.

The increasingly dangerous friction between the world's two largest nuclear powers is unfolding in the context of growing war dangers internationally, particularly on the Korean peninsula. Russian President Vladimir Putin warned on Friday that the increasingly bellicose confrontation between the US and North Korea had left the region "balanced on the verge of a large-scale conflict."

It is in this context that the reported threats of an escalation of nuclear brinksmanship on the continent of Europe pose such an imminent danger.

A NATO document classified as secret, which was obtained by a joint research group made up of the Süddeutsche Zeitung and public regional broadcasters NDR and WDR, contains 39 proposals on how NATO can take action against Russia. According to diplomats, "formal consultations within NATO" could take place in the autumn at the initiative of the US. The paper was "a compendium of all options available" carefully "divided up into the categories 'conceivable', 'currently to be avoided' and 'not advisable'."

Even the more than a dozen "conceivable" options, which NATO believes would be compatible with the INF agreement, "would exacerbate already tense relations," according to the Süddeutsche Zeitung. Proposals include "increased rotation of B-2 and B-52 bombers from the US to Europe," an "expansion of early warning systems and missile or submarine defence," and the strengthening of "military and civilian infrastructure against attacks." The increased readiness and capability for a nuclear retaliatory strike, "nuclear signalling," is seen as "conceivable."

Two proposals are especially provocative: "to expand the so-called nuclear targeting planning - i.e. identifying and confirming the targets for nuclear weapons," and "to increase the operational readiness of those air bases that would drop these bombs in case of war." On this, "NATO also advises caution," the Süddeutsche noted. The confirmation of targets, i.e., the concrete planning of a nuclear assault, could rapidly provoke a nuclear war with Russia, which could potentially wipe out humanity.

According to the Süddeutsche Zeitung, if the US abandons the INF treaty, "measures currently found in the 'not advisable' category [would be] conceivable: Construction, testing and stationing of a new class of missiles - a further step into a new Cold War."

The German ruling class is extremely concerned by Washington's increasingly aggressive war drive against Russia. Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel (Social Democrats, SPD) warned in an interview on Thursday against "repeating the worst mistakes of the Cold War. We are on our way to a Cold War 2.0. All of the good treaties on disarmament and arms controls from Gorbachev and Reagan are in acute peril. Europe is threatened once again with becoming a military training ground for nuclear weapons."

He continued: "It is wrong for Mrs. Merkel to remain silent on this. Germany of all countries must raise its voice against this. We have to stick to being a power for peace and oppose an arms spiral. In that context, I found the statement by [SPD Chancellor candidate] Martin Schulz that we must focus on finally ridding our country of nuclear weapons to be correct."

Schulz and Gabriel are in the midst of an election campaign, and are well aware that the vast majority of Germany's population - like that of the rest of the planet - opposes military rearmament and war, and would welcome the withdrawal of the US nuclear weapons still stationed in Germany.

The two Social Democratic politicians are by no means committed to peace, but are rather leading representatives of German imperialism. They oppose the US plans for nuclear rearmament because a return to the conditions of the Cold War would endanger Germany's own plans for global power and increase Berlin's dependence on the US. It would undermine Germany's economic and geopolitical interests, which are ever more at odds with those of Washington.

In July, Gabriel strongly criticized the latest US sanctions against Russia. Although Europe and the US had "jointly and in close consultation answered Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea and Russia's actions in eastern Ukraine, "it was not possible to accept "the threat of unlawful extraterritorial sanctions against European companies participating in the expansion of European energy supplies!" The supply of energy to Europe was "a European affair and not one for the United States of America!"

Following the latest threats from the US, the Social Democrats are leading the way in attempting to transform the widespread opposition to Donald Trump's right-wing, militarist policies into support for German militarism. Asked whether he thought "the fear of many Germans that Trump could overreact and incite a war is justified," Gabriel answered, "I am concerned that the US will be forever lost to the West. Some of the people around Donald Trump want to replace the rule of law with the law of the strongest. We must assert ourselves against this."

Papers published by think tanks and the major political parties give a sense of the methods German imperialism intends to use to "assert" its interests. In "Principles for a Social Democratic Security and Defence Policy," the SPD writes, "To be equal to the increased demands for international deployments to tackle crises, cyber defence, and the defence of our own population, we need a modern armed forces capable of action. We need an army in which [...] troops capable of deploying are ready for crisis situations. For this we have to better equip the army with personnel and material."