C14 fascists
© Zurab Javakhadze/TASS
C14 fascister
Da den demokratisk valgte præsident i Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovich, blev afsat i et blodigt amerikansk støttet kup i februar 2014, der vendte Ukraine mod Rusland, var én af dem det gavnede Ukraines antirussiske kirke: Den ukrainske ortodokse kirke, Kiev patriarkatet (UOC-KP).

Kirken blev etableret i 1992 af en tidligere Metropolitan ved Moskvapatriarkatet, Filaret (Denisenko), efter at det var mislykkedes ham at blive valgt til "Primat" for den Russisk ortodokse kirke (ROC). Dette ledte til, at han helt brød med kirken og skabte sin egen nye i Ukraine. Senere i 1995, da han blev valgt til overhoved af den nye krike, erklærede Filaret sig Patriark af UOC-KP.

I dag tillader den intenst antirussiske postkup regering i Ukraine, at Filarets præsteskab leder deres menigheder i angreb for at tage kontrol med kirker og andre faciliteter, der tilhørte den oprindelige kirke, Ukraines Ortodokse Kirke (Moskva patriarkatet, UOC-MP).

Desuden er Filarets taler åbenlyst fjendtlige mod beboere i Ukraines mest østlige del, Donbass, hvor over 90 % af den lokale befolkning havde stemt for den væltede præsident og nægtede at acceptere kupregimet, og derfor erklærede udbryderrepublikkerne Lugansk og Donetsk.


Kommentar: Delvist oversat af Sott.net fra US Coup in Ukraine Has Produced Religious Persecutions


A typical headline in Ukraine these past few years is Filaret on the war in Donbass: 'It is a punishment for godlessness', which quotes the 'holy man' as saying:
"Today, people suffer more in the East of Ukraine, not the West. Why? Because there are many more atheists than in the West. It is home to the so-called proletariat, the people who were brought up in atheism. If they do not repent and turn to God, their suffering will continue."
He attributes their suffering not to the bombs and bullets coming at them from the post-coup Government, but to their "proletariat" leanings and their lack of suitable religious faith. Living near the Ukraine-Russia border, the majority of those people of course traditionally belong to the UOC-MP, but Filaret damns Donbass residents as being "atheists", therefore siding very clearly with the Government that's bombing them.

Another recent headline was Filaret Leads a Procession of ATO (military servicemen and volunteers engaged in fighting against the residents of Donbass region), in which he openly sided with the killers of Donbass residents.

In contrast, the UOC-MP, a self-governing Church in spiritual unity with the Moscow Patriarch, adheres to a neutral peacekeeping position regarding the conflict in Donbass. For that reason the Primate of the UOC-MP, Metropolitan Onufriy, faces harsh criticism from the warmongers but remains widely respected by people on both sides of the frontline. Because of this, his mediation has repeatedly contributed to the release of captured Ukrainians. For example, among his achievements has been the swap in December 2017 when, at his request, more than 200 prisoners on both sides were exchanged.

In return for its support of the post-coup nationalist rhetoric, the Ukrainian Government openly favors the Kyivan Patriarchate, which is effectively a church of Russia-haters. Continuing a policy of 'de-Russification', which has already affected the cultural sphere, the authorities want to oust the UOC-MP from Ukraine altogether and create a single loyal Church based on the Kyivan Patriarchate. With the connivance of local officials and the support of nationalist groups, the Kyivan Patriarchate has been seizing UOC-MP churches, accusing its clergy and followers (whose numbers are three times larger than those of the UOC-KP) of 'non-patriotism' and 'treason'. However, such politically-biased and unchristian behavior of the UOC-KP clergy has so far largely served to deter believers from Kyiv's 'National Orthodox Church' project.

President Poroshenko openly demonstrates his new religious preference (until 2014 he was an active follower of the UOC-MP). Officials at various levels and the media have accepted and broadcast the regime's guideline, according to which the UOC-KP is the 'legitimate' Church, while the UOC-MP is 'the Kremlin's agent'. In 2016, Poroshenko and Ukrainian deputies sent letters to Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople asking him to recognize the Kyiv Patriarchate as a legitimate Church. Over the last couple of years, new bills have been introduced which would oblige the UOC-MP to change its name and coordinate its appointment of hierarchs with the state, while restricting UOC-MP priests from preaching among believers in law enforcement and security agencies. Despite there being no formal procedures for determining church membership in communities, churches are also being obliged to switch denomination on the basis of simply declaring majority support among a church's following.

On January 24th, 2018, at the 26th International Christmas Educational Conference, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused international organizations of ignoring human rights violations in Ukraine:
"Connivance at the seizure of cathedrals of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and violence against its clergy and believers, continues. Attempts to restrict the activities of this major religion in Ukraine and split church communities are ongoing. We demanded that the OSCE, the Council of Europe, the UN and the EU come up with a specific response to these illegal activities. We have not seen an adequate response so far."
The next day, members of 'C14', a Ukrainian neo-Nazi organization that has direct links with the Ukrainian intelligence agency SBU, broke into the offices of the Union of Orthodox Journalists news agency in Kyiv, attempted to set fire to the UOC-MP's Monastery of the Tithes, then painted slogans on its walls and cut down an information stand. The police took no action to stop the intruders. Although an investigation was opened concerning wilful destruction of the monastery's property, the resulting impact on its journalistic activities was ignored.

Two men were detained for causing damage to property and were potentially facing up to 15 years in prison. On January 27th, the court imposed a restraint - two months of arrest, or bail of €66,000 Euros. It's known that the judge presiding over the case was pressured with threats of violence against her family. On February 5th, the C14 thugs were released following the intercession of several parliamentarians. The C14 organization claimed that the arsonists were bailed out by Rada deputy Igor Lutsenko and that the prosecutor had insisted on placing them under house arrest.

Additionally, on January 11th this year, a regional Prosecutor's Office opened a criminal case against an UOC-MP priest who refused to break Church rules and perform a ritual on a tragically deceased baby who had been baptized by a priest of the UOC-KP. Thus, the Ukrainian authorities - in addition to their dilettante accusations, appeals to ban the UOC-MP, granting preferences to the Kyivan Patriarchate, and pandering to raider attacks on churches - are also interfering in the ritual activities of Ukrainian religious organizations.

The Kyiv Government is intervening in the religious sphere at the international, national and local levels, regardless of the law or common sense. The authorities of the new 'European Ukraine' seem to be guided by the Peace of Augsburg Treaty (1555) and consider it legitimate to dictate to their vassals and subjects which faith they must profess. Moreover, they violate the right of members of the 'wrong' confessions to profess their religion, as enshrined in the Treaty of Westphalia (1648).

The principle of the Augsburg Settlement, Cuius regio, eius religio ("whose realm, his religion"), became obsolete as early as the 18th century, after being one of the causes of the Thirty Years' interfaith war, which brought death and ruin to Europe. But it's the 21st century now, and there are international human rights documents - for example, the EU Guidelines on the Promotion and Protection of Freedom of Religion or Belief.

However, Ukrainian authorities apparently reject modern democratic legality, even telling Europe that the principles of the Peace of Augsburg should once again be in force, depriving people of freedom of religion. For example, a member of the 'People's Front Party', Viktor Yelensky, is calling for European institutions to ban certain "politicized" representative offices of religious organizations, specifically those representing or having ties with the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC). His rationale for thereby depriving people of their freedom of religion is that the ROC is a Trojan horse through which the Russian government conducts "hybrid war" against Ukraine, and through which it also attempts to 'influence' first European religious then political organizations.

If the new Ukraine thinks it can unwind history and institute religious discrimination - and even persecution - it is completely deluded if its plan is to lobby Europe to follow its lead back into the Dark Ages.
About the author

Jelena Rakcevic is a freelance journalist, graduating with a Masters in International Relations from the University of Montenegro in 2013. Her reports have been published by EurasiaReview.com, ModernDiplomacy.eu and other digital media.