covid emojis
Da jeg skrev tilbage i marts, at Storbritannien som vi vidste, at det var færdigt, gjorde jeg det af tre hovedårsager:

For det første kan massekarantæne af millioner af raske mennesker for (næsten) første gang i historien for en virus, der ikke tilnærmelsesvis er dødelig for dem (og ja dette blev kendt i marts) umuligt være en medicinsk nødvendighed og skal i stedet være af en anden grund. Jeg siger 'næsten', fordi der var et andet kortvarigt forsøg på massekarantæne for raske mennesker i Mexico tilbage i 2009, men eksperimentet sluttede efter mindre end tre uger, da den mexicanske regering kom til fornuft og indså den enorme sociale og økonomisk skade, det ville gøre for deres land. Vi er ikke nær så heldige og har nu været underkastet vores psykologiske, økonomiske og sociale prøve [Psychological, Economic and Social Trial (PEST)] i 8 måneder, inklusive to meningsløse nationale lockdowns; Maskup, som er designet til at bevare frygt, teste vores overholdelse af udstukne regler og få os til at gå rundt som ydmyge fanger; sammen med fuldstændig absurde diktater, såsom Fiddlesticks-reglen, eller hvad det end kaldes. Hvis nogen stadig seriøst mener, at dette blev gjort af sundhedsmæssige årsager, er der - forstår jeg - en række broer, der går billigt på Ebay.

For det andet var undertrykkelsen over for folket under den absurde påstand om, at vi kan kontrollere vira, sandsynligvis langt længere end vi fik at vide, da coronavirus ikke bare forsvinder. Og fordi de ikke forsvinder, var ændringerne i den sociale, økonomiske og psykologiske tilstand for mennesker, familier, samfund og hele nationer nødt til at være seismiske og endda epokale. Og sådan viser det sig at være. 2020 er ikke bare endnu et år; det er starten på en ny æra, og ikke mindre end en uhyggelig start.

For det tredje blev det ganske klart for mig for længe siden, at vestlige samfund er flyttet fra en stat, hvor folk med rimelighed kunne være sikre på, at det, de fik at vide af regeringer og medier, i det mindste havde noget grundlag i virkeligheden, til en, hvor selve virkeligheden blev formforskudt og manipuleret i en sådan grad, at det nu stort set er umuligt at være sikker på, hvad der længere er og ikke er reelt i borgernes sfære. Vi lever nu i verden af ​​uvirkelighed, hvor sandheden begraves og tilsløres af et ret uanstændigt bjerg af løgne og bedrag.

Kommentar: Delvist oversat af fra Willing Slaves of the Covidian State?

I am quite sure that with a few exceptions, most people who read what I wrote in March thought I had lost what remaining marbles I may once have possessed. But I am equally sure that many more people now start to see what I was getting at, and are also wondering what happened to their country and whether they'll ever get it back.

A key part of doing so, along with the obvious need for national repentance, is that third point. I often come back to a comment attributed to Karl Rove, George W. Bush's Chief of Staff, since it is perhaps the best explanation of what has been done to us over the last couple of decades, and in 2020 is being dished out in the concentrated version and causing the world to go off in the great nutsy, loony spasm that it has:
"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
Few would associate Rove with revolutionary fervour, but there is in this statement something remarkably revolutionary.

Firstly, it assumes that human actions are solely in the hands of man, without reference to a Creator who is ultimately sovereign.

Secondly, it assumes the rights of a small clique of people to shape the lives and destinies of those they purport to govern, and so thus they view themselves as sovereign (Psalm 2 says they're deluded fools, which they are).

Thirdly, it assumes that this clique are not themselves subject to real reality, like the rest of us, but that they themselves have the tools, the opportunities and the right to "make reality".

Fourthly, it assumes that they are prepared to lie brazenly to bring this reality about.

Fifthly, it assumes that there will be seekers of the truth amidst these lies, but that these poor saps will be left floundering as they continually attempt to subject yesterday's narrative to scrutiny, while the reality shape-shifters have pulled the rug from under their feet by moving the narrative onto tomorrow's barefaced lies.

And this is exactly what we find. A recent example of this can be found in the fact that the figures used to plunge millions of British people into a second disastrous and needless national Lockdown, were shown to be demonstrably false. That is not even a matter of dispute. Did it lead to the Lockdown being cancelled and the media demanding an inquiry? No, because the narrative has moved on, and what's apparently more important than demanding this nonsense stop, is whether Comrade de Pfeffel's girlfriend told Comrade de Pfeffel to sack that Cummings bloke etc. If you like, you can spend hours pointing out that the Lockdown is based on a lie, using meticulous, painstaking work, presented as compellingly as its possible to make it, but apart from a few weirdos like me, who cares? The Government and Global Pravda (aka the mainstream media) have moved the narrative on and are creating their new "realities", which now includes all sorts of bombardments about "the vaccine". And although the average person knows at some level that they're being constantly lied to, the lies and deceptions are so great that most people actually find it more comfortable to go along with them than to consider the deeply uncomfortable truth about the nature of the society they now live in. Comfortable lies are easier to cope with than uncomfortable truths — if you have no principles and no backbone, that is.

And therein lies the problem. The reality shape-shifters shape-shift reality, people like me judiciously study and question it, but as we do they've already moved on, created their new realities, which entrench previous lies by building on them as if they were truth, such that the many are happy to believe them and point the "conspiracy loon" finger at those who are doing the judicious studying.

If I had to sum up 2020, I'd say it feels like living inside the dystopic world imagined by an overweight, basement-dwelling "conspiracy theorist" in his 17th unpublished novel, but with the majority of people cackling "conspiracy theorist" derisively at anyone who points out that we appear to be living in his book. The laugh is on them, of course. We're just pointing out how ludicrous and naff the fat guy's plotline is, whilst they are actually living it, believing it, and apparently enjoying it.

But the success of these "history's actors", these "reality creators" these "shape-shifters" is entirely reliant on one thing: that the number of people judiciously studying their actions remains small. If it does, they can continue playing their sick game of treating people like human cattle with impunity, labelling those who are studying and questioning their actions as cranks and conspiracy loons. Only if a critical mass of people start questioning it is their despotic and demonic project undermined as they are now find themselves subject to critical scrutiny by people with their eyes wide open, their grey cells engaged, and sufficient numbers to make it tell.

Ultimately, it comes down to a simple question: Are enough people actually going to get their heads out the sand, switch off the Brainwasher in the corner of their living rooms, and actually start to think critically about what is happening, such that the "reality creators" are held to account and stopped in their tracks? Or are they simply happy to go on accepting those comfortable lies, rejecting the uncomfortable truths, and so find ourselves slipping further into the Land of Unreality, where the Shadows Reign, and where a powerful clique of despicable technocrats run almost every aspect of our lives from the time we wake to the time we go to sleep?

Real Reality or Gross Unreality?

Uncomfortable Truth or Comforting Lies?

Human Cattle or Free Beings?

These are the choices facing us. Will we reject the project that is turning us into Another Place, Another People altogether; or will we meekly accept our lot as Willing Slaves of the Covidian State?


I would like to commend this superb interview with Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi to you. Dr Bhakdi is one of the most qualified men on the planet to talk some rationality and sanity into the Covid-nonsense, and he does so in his articulate, winsome and deeply compassionate way, debunking Lockdown, social distancing, and masking nonsense as he goes.