elderly
En JAMA undersøgelse har fundet at influenza vaccination, som er givet til 60% af mennesker over 65 år, kan være dræbende af et betydeligt antal af ældre borgere.

Sharyl Attkisson, en tidligere undersøgende journalist for CBS, siger at undersøgelsen viser at der ikke er nogen forbedring i dødelighedsraten blandt ældre borgere som får influenza vaccinationen og kunne faktisk medvirke til øget dårligt helbred og død.

Inquisitr.com rapporterer: Undersøgelsen "fik kun lille opmærksomhed," siger hun, "fordi videnskaben kom fra den forkerte side." Hvor forskere havde sat sig for at bevise at et skub for massiv influenza vaccination ville redde verden, så var forskerne "forbavset" over at finde at dataerne slet ikke understøttede deres forudsætninger. Dataerne viste faktisk at dødeligheden steg og ikke faldt , blandt seniorborgere efterfølgende vaccinationen.

Johns Hopkins videnskabsmanden, Peter Doshi, Ph.D., udstedte en rapport i det prestigiøse blad British Medical Journal, ifølge NewsLI, hævdende at CDCs (CDC= center for sygdomskontrol og forebyggelse) politik med rutinemæssigt at anbefale influenza vaccinering er bygget på "undersøgelser af lav kvalitet som ikke underbygger påstanden." Han siger at der ikke er nogen beviser for at vaccination reducerer dødeligheden blandt ældre borgere. Doshi citerer interessant nok en australsk undersøgelse som ligeledes fandt en betydelig risiko for børn, erklærende at "en ud af hvert 110. barn under fem års alderen havde krampetrækninger efter vaccinationen i 2009 for H1N1 influenzaen."

Under medicinske forsøg for Fluzone influenze vaccinen, døde 23 seniorer ud 3833 efter at have modtaget vaccinationen, ifølge en følgeseddel i vaccinens indpakning, rapporterede Health Impact News. Yderligere 226 mennesker led "alvorlige bivirkninger." Medicinalfirmaet nægter at der er nogen forbindelse mellem dødsfaldene og influenza vaccinen.


Kommentar: Denne artikel er delvis oversat til dansk af Sott.net fra: Flu vaccines are killing senior citizens, study warns


Seniors Told Get Flu Vaccine

There appears to be growing public skepticism that the flu vaccine is as beneficial as the experts say, according to an earlier Inquisitr report. The level of doubt is strongly correlated to the incidence of accounts of research fraud in the vaccine industry, an industry which makes billions of dollars of profit every year.

Often when an article about the dangers of a vaccine comes out, there are people who write in to tell about a family member who was harmed by the vaccine, and the flu vaccine for senior citizens in no exception. A number of people have written to report that their grandmother, or uncle, or brother died shortly after getting a flu shot, sometimes after receiving their first ever such shot. Their stories are frequently minimized, yet the government pays out more compensation from the flu vaccine than any other vaccine.

Despite this, it is increasingly expected that every senior citizen line up for their annual flu shot.

A nursing home near Atlanta, Georgia, now reports a devastating outcome to such a policy, according to Health Impact News. All of the residents of the Hope Assisted Living & Memory Care were given a flu vaccine on Friday, November 7. Every one of the senior citizens developed an immediate fever. Within the week following, five of them died. The source reports that the facility's typical pattern is one or two losses every six months, frequently due to Alzheimer's.

"The facility is not saying they are related to the flu shot but we all know they are, and they know they are."

Questions must be asked, then, such as: do the benefits of getting a flu vaccine outweigh the risks, especially among vulnerable senior citizens? Or would they be better off choosing to reject the shot? Who benefits if evidence showing the harm of the vaccine is buried? And what would be the motive for fabricating evidence of harm if none exists? If the facts are as solid as some insist, then why do they seem to be threatened by the data being challenged? Shouldn't truth be able to stand up under scrutiny?